A Blockchain-empowered Access Control Framework for Smart Devices in Green Internet of Things (2024)

Skip Abstract Section

1. K. Yu, L. Tan, M. Aloqaily, and Y. Jararweh. [n.d.]. Blockchain-Enhanced data sharing with traceable and direct revocation in IIoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. DOI:10.1109/TII.2021.3049141Google Scholar
2. Balasubramanian Venkatraman, Faisal Zaman, Moayad Aloqaily, Ismaeel Al Ridhawi, Yaser Jararweh, and Haythem Bany Salameh. 2019. A mobility management architecture for seamless delivery of 5G-IoT services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’19). IEEE, 1–7.Google Scholar
3. Muhammad Bhatti, Javeria Hamza, Muhammad Usman, Ghani Khan, Razi Khan, Moayad Iqbal, Yaser Aloqaily, Jararweh, and Brij Gupta. 2019. Soft computing-based EEG classification by optimal feature selection and neural networks. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 15, 10 (2019), 5747–5754.Google ScholarCross Ref
4. Elisa Bertino, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, Dimitrios Georgakopolous, and Surya Nepal. 2016. Internet of things (IoT): Smart and secure service delivery. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 16, 4 (Dec. 2016). DOI:DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3013520 Google ScholarDigital Library
5. M. A. M. Albreem. 2017. Green internet of things (IoT): An overview. In Proceedings of theIEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Application (ICSIMA’17). 1–6.Google ScholarCross Ref
6. A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash. 2015. Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 174 (2015), 2347–2376.Google ScholarDigital Library
7. R. Xu. 2018. BlendCAC: A. smart contract enabled decentralized capability-based access control mechanism for the IoT. Computers 7, 3 (2018), 39.Google ScholarCross Ref
8. E. Fernandes, J. Jung, and A. Prakash. 2016. Security analysis of emerging smart home applications. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.Google Scholar
9. Tseng Lewis, Liwen Wong, Safa Otoum, Moayad Aloqaily, and Jalel Ben Othman. 2020. Blockchain for managing heterogeneous internet of things: A perspective architecture. IEEE Netw. 341 (2020), 16–23.Google Scholar
10. Christina Patsioura. 2018. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies: What’s the value for IoT?Technical Report. GSMA Intelligence.Google Scholar
11. Tang Bo. 2019. IoT Passport: A blockchain-based trust framework for collaborative internet-of-things. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM, 2019. Google ScholarDigital Library
12. Y. Tian. 2017. Smartauth: User-centered authorization for the internet of things. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Conference.361–378. Google ScholarDigital Library
13. Al Ridhawi, Ismaeel, Safa OtoumMoayad Aloqaily, Yaser Jararweh, and Thar Baker. 2020. Providing secure and reliable communication for next generation networks in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 56 (2020), 102080.Google ScholarCross Ref
14. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C, INC. DIDs.Retrieved from https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/.Google Scholar
15. C. Feng, etal. 2021. Efficient and secure data sharing for 5G flying drones: A blockchain-enabled approach. IEEE Network 35, 1 (2021), 130–137. DOI:10.1109/MNET.011.2000223Google ScholarDigital Library
16. L. Tan, H. Xiao, K. Yu, M. Aloqaily, and Y. Jararweh. 2021. A Blockchain-empowered Crowdsourcing System for 5G-enabled Smart Cities. Computer Standards & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2021.103517.Google Scholar
17. H. Li, K. Yu, B. Liu, C. Feng, Z. Qin, and G. Srivastava. 2021. An efficient ciphertext-policy weighted attribute-based encryption for the Internet of health things. In IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2021.3075995Google Scholar
18. R. S. Sandhu, E. J. Coyne, H. L. Feinstein, and C. E. Youman. 1996. Role-based access control models. Computer 29, 2 (1996), 38–47. Google ScholarDigital Library
19. G. Zhang and J. Tian. 2010. An extended role-based access control model for the internet of things. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference onInformation Networking and Automation (ICINA’10). IEEE, V1–319.Google Scholar
20. L. M. S. De Souza, P. Spiess, D. Guinard, M. Köhler, S. Karnouskos, and D. Savio. 2008. Socrades: A web service-based shop floor integration infrastructure. In The Internet of Things. Springer, 50–67. Google ScholarDigital Library
21. P. Spiess, S. Karnouskos, D. Guinard, D. Savio, O. Baecker, L. M. S. De Souza, and V. Trifa. 2009. SOA-based integration of the internet of things in enterprise services. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference onWeb Services(ICWS’09). IEEE, 968–975. Google ScholarDigital Library
22. R. Pandita, X. Xiao, W. Yang, W. Enck, and T. Xie. 2013. WHYPER: Towards automating risk assessment of mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 22nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’13). 527–542. Google ScholarDigital Library
23. M. Zhang, Y. Duan, Q. Feng, and H. Yin. 2015. Towards automatic generation of security-centric descriptions for Android apps. In Proceedings of the22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 518–529. Google ScholarDigital Library
24. N. Ye. 2014. An efficient authentication and access control scheme for perception layer of internet of things. Appl. Math. & Info. Sci. 8, 4 (2014), 1–8.Google Scholar
25. Maanak Gupta and Ravi Sandhu. 2018. Authorization framework for secure cloud assisted connected cars and vehicular internet of things. In Proceedings of the23rd ACM on Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM, 193–204. Google ScholarDigital Library
26. G. Ho, D. Leung, P. Mishra, A. Hosseini, D. Song, and D. Wagner. 2016. Smart locks: Lessons for securing commodity internet of things devices. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security.ACM, 461–472. Google ScholarDigital Library
27. I. Bouij-Pasquier, A. Ouahman, A. El Kalam, and M. Ouabiba de Montfort. 2015. SmartOrBAC security and privacy in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACS 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications.IEEE, 1–8.Google Scholar
28. SMARTTHINGS, INC. Samsung SmartThings. 2017. Retrieved fromhttps://www.smartthings.com/.Google Scholar
29. GOOGLE, INC. Brillo. 2016. Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/brillo/.Google Scholar
30. GOOGLE, INC. Weave. 2016. Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/weave/.Google Scholar
31. APPLE, INC. Apple HomeKit. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/ios/home/.Google Scholar
32. FCCONTROL 4, INC. fccontrol4. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.fccontrol4.com/.Google Scholar
33. H. Shafa*gh, L. Burkhalter, A. Hithnawi, and S. Duquennoy. 2017. Towards blockchain-based auditable storage and sharing of IoT data. In Proceedings of theCloud Computing Security Workshop. ACM, 45–50. DOI:10.1145/3140649.3140656. Google ScholarDigital Library
34. Y. Mei. 2017. Simplification model construction of internet access control based on blockchain. J. Commun. Univ. China 24,5 (2017), 7–12.Google Scholar
35. A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, and P. Gauravaram. 2017. Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. In Proceedings of the International Conference onPervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops’17). IEEE, 618–623.Google Scholar
36. G. Zyskind and O. Nathan. 2015. Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW’15). IEEE, 180–184. DOI:10.1109/SPW.2015.27 Google ScholarCross Ref
37. Y. Zhang, S. Kasahara, Y. Shen, X. Jiang, and J. Wan. 2019. Smart contract-based access control for the Internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 2 (2019), 1594–1605. DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2018.2847705Google ScholarCross Ref
38. N. Rifi, E. Rachkidi, N. Agoulmine, and N. C. Taher. 2017. Towards using blockchain technology for IoT data access protection. In Proceedings of theIEEE 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband (ICUWB’17)IEEE, 1–5. DOI:10.1109/ICUWB.2017.8251003Google Scholar
39. N. Fotiou, I. Pittaras, V. A. Siris, and G. C. Polyzos. 2019. Enabling opportunistic users in multi-tenant IoT systems using decentralized identifiers and permissioned blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2nd International ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy for the Internet-of-Things (IoT S&P’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 22–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3338507.3358622 Google ScholarDigital Library
40. Y. Kortesniemi, D. Lagutin, T. Elo, and N. Fotiou. 2019. Improving the Privacy of IoT with Decentralised Identifiers (DIDs). Journal of Computer Networks and Communications 2019, Article 8706760 (2019), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8706760.Google Scholar
41. FISCO BCOS, INC. FISCO BCOS. 2020. Retrieved from http://www.fisco-bcos.org/.Google Scholar
42. E. Yuan and J. Tong. 2005. Attributed based access control (ABAC) for web services. In Proceedings of theIEEE International Conference on Web Services. DOI:10.1109/ICWS.2005.25 Google ScholarDigital Library
43. M. Hemdi and R. Deters. 2016. Using REST based protocol to enable ABAC within IoT systems. In Proceedings of theInformation Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference. IEEE, 1–7. DOI:10.1109/IEMCON.2016.7746297Google Scholar
44. J. Wu, M. Dong, K. Ota, and B. Pei. 2014. A fine-grained cross-domain access control mechanism for social internet of things. In Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. IEEE, 666–671. DOI:10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom.2014.140 Google ScholarDigital Library
45. I. A. Ridhawi, S. Otoum, M. Aloqaily, and A. Boukerche. 2014. Generalizing AI: challenges and opportunities for plug and play AI solutions. IEEE Network 35, 1 (2014), 372–379. DOI:10.1109/MNET.011.2000371Google ScholarDigital Library
46. K. Sun and L. Yin. 2014. Attribute-role-based hybrid access control in the internet of things. In Proceedings of theAsia-Pacific Web Conference. Springer International Publishing, 333–343. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11119-3_31Google Scholar
47. G. Zhang and Gong W.2011. The research of access control based on UCON in the internet of things. J. Softw. 6,4 (2011), 724–731. DOI:10.4304/jsw.6.4.724-731Google Scholar
48. G. Zhang and W. Gong. 2012. The research of access control in the application of VANET based on UCON. Procedia Eng. 29 (2012), 4091–4095. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.625Google ScholarCross Ref
49. J. Park and R. Sandhu. 2002. Towards usage control models: Beyond traditional access control. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT’02). Association for Computing Machinery, 57–64. DOI:10.1145/507711.507722 Google ScholarDigital Library
50. H. Shen and S. Liu. 2014. Context-aware capability-based access control framework for the internet of things. Journal of Wuhan University60 (2014), 424–428. DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8836. 2014.05.008Google Scholar
51. S. Gusmeroli, S. Piccione, and D. A. Rotondi. Capability-based becurity approach to manage access control in the internet of things. Math. Comput. Model. 58, 5–6 (2013), 1189–1205. DOI:10.1016/j.mcm.2013.02.006Google Scholar
52. R. Want. 2006. An introduction to RFID technology. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 5, 1 (2006), 25–33. Google ScholarDigital Library
53. Yuan Yong and Wang Feiyue. 2016. Current status and prospects of blockchain technology development. J. Automat. 42, 4 (2016), 481–494.Google Scholar

Index Terms

1. A Blockchain-empowered Access Control Framework for Smart Devices in Green Internet of Things

   1. Security and privacy

      1. Systems security

         1. Distributed systems security

• Decentralized, BlockChain Based Access Control Framework for the Heterogeneous Internet of Things

  ABAC'18: Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Attribute-Based Access Control

  Privacy and safety are the most needed features while accessing the data in the IoT. Due to the complicated decentralization and heterogeneous environment present in IoT, the security and privacy of the data becomes a challenging job for the developers. ...

  Read More

• Blockchain based permission delegation and access control in Internet of Things (BACI)

  Abstract

  Access control with permission delegation mechanism allows fine granular access to secure resources. In the literature, existing architectures for permission delegation and access control are either event-based or query-based. These ...

  Read More

• A survey on blockchain envisioned attribute based access control for internet of things: Overview, comparative analysis, and open research challenges

  Abstract

  The Internet of Things (IoT) network is rapidly expanding due to sudden technological advancements, which enable objects to become intelligent and contribute to the network. Before permitting a newly added IoT device to communicate with the ...

  Read More